NHL · August 13, 2026
Grading 101: Is It Worth Sending Your Card to PSA or BGS?
At some point, almost every collector ends up staring at a card and asking the same question: is this worth sending off to get graded? It's not a cheap decision — grading costs money and time, and it doesn't always pay off the way people expect. Here's an honest breakdown of what grading actually does, when it's worth it, and when you're better off leaving a card raw.
What Grading Actually Is
Grading is a third-party evaluation of a card's physical condition, performed by a company like PSA, BGS (Beckett Grading Services), or SGC. You send the card in, it gets examined under controlled conditions for four main factors — centering, corners, edges, and surface — and comes back sealed in a hard plastic case (a "slab") with a numeric grade, typically on a 1-to-10 scale, printed on the label along with the card's basic details.
The core value grading adds is trust. A raw card's condition is whatever the seller says it is, which buyers have to take on faith or verify from photos. A graded card's condition is independently verified and locked in — a PSA 10 means the same thing regardless of who's selling it, and that consistency is exactly what serious buyers are paying a premium for.
Why Grading Can Increase a Card's Value
For the right card, grading can meaningfully increase what a buyer is willing to pay, for a few compounding reasons. First, it removes condition risk entirely, so buyers don't have to worry about a card being mishandled after purchase or misrepresented before it. Second, top grades (particularly a perfect 10) carry their own premium beyond just "confirmed good condition" — a Gem Mint 10 of a chased rookie can sell for multiples of what a raw, ungraded copy of the same card sells for, purely because that top grade is rare and verified.
Take a card like Connor Bedard's Young Guns rookie. A raw copy in genuinely great condition might sell reasonably well on reputation alone, but a PSA 10 of the same card removes all doubt for a buyer and typically commands a real premium over raw sales, because the grade itself becomes part of what's being purchased — not just the card, but the certainty.
Why Grading Isn't Always Worth It
Here's the part new collectors often skip past: grading costs money upfront, takes weeks to months depending on the service tier and how backed up the grading company is, and there's real risk the card comes back with a lower grade than you expected. A card you were confident was a 9 can come back a 7 if there's a flaw you didn't catch — a soft corner invisible to the naked eye, a slight print line, off-centering that's hard to judge without a loupe. That lower grade is now locked in and disclosed on the label forever; there's no "trying again" on the same physical card once it's been graded once and the result is what it is.
For a base card or a common numbered parallel of a player without strong long-term demand, grading fees can easily exceed what the raw card is worth in the first place, let alone what the graded version would sell for. Sending a $15 card in for $25-$50 grading fees is a losing trade before you even get the result back, regardless of what grade it earns.
The general rule collectors use: only grade cards that are already worth meaningfully more than the grading fee in raw condition, and that you're confident are in genuinely strong shape before submitting. Grading isn't a way to add value to a mediocre card — it's a way to formally document and unlock value that's already there in a card that deserves it.
Choosing Between PSA, BGS, and Others
PSA is generally considered the most recognized and most liquid grading company in the hobby, meaning PSA-graded cards tend to be easiest to sell and often carry the strongest market premium, all else equal. BGS is well respected too, particularly known for its subgrade system, which breaks the four condition factors out individually on the label rather than combining them into one number — useful if you want more granular detail, though the combined "Black Label" 10 (a perfect 10 across all four subgrades) is notoriously harder to achieve than a PSA 10, which uses a more holistic scoring approach.
SGC has grown in reputation in recent years and offers a solid middle ground — generally lower fees and faster turnaround than PSA, with a growing base of collector trust, though it still doesn't quite carry the same resale premium PSA does for most cards. None of these are wrong choices exactly; it comes down to what you're grading, your budget, and how quickly you need the card back.
Turnaround Time Is a Real Factor
It's worth being realistic about turnaround. Standard grading tiers at the major companies can take anywhere from several weeks to several months, depending on submission volume, and faster tiers cost significantly more per card. If you're grading a card to flip quickly, factor that wait time into your plan — a card that sits in grading limbo for four months isn't generating any return during that stretch, and market conditions (and player performance) can shift in the meantime.
Bulk vs. Individual Submissions
Most grading companies offer bulk or "value" tiers that lower the per-card cost significantly if you're submitting a batch rather than a single card, which is part of why serious collectors tend to save up cards over months before submitting a grading order rather than sending cards in one at a time. If you've got a handful of candidates sitting in top-loaders waiting to be graded, it's usually worth the patience to build a batch rather than paying full individual-submission pricing repeatedly.
What Makes a Card a Good Grading Candidate
Beyond raw value, a few specific traits make a card a stronger grading candidate. Cards from products known for tight centering and clean cuts (some sets are notoriously harder to find well-centered than others) tend to grade higher on average, which is worth researching before you assume your card is a lock for a 10. Rookie cards and numbered parallels of proven or clearly rising stars are safer grading bets than speculative rookies, since the demand for a high grade of an established name is more durable.
A card like Auston Matthews's early rookie cards is a good example — his career trajectory has made his rookie-year cardboard a consistently strong grading candidate over time, because the demand for a top-graded copy has only grown as his career has developed, rather than depending on a single strong season.
Grading for Preservation, Not Just Value
It's worth mentioning that not everyone grades purely for resale value. Some collectors grade a card specifically to preserve it — the slab itself is a genuinely protective case, arguably more protective long-term than a top-loader and one-touch combination, since it's sealed and tamper-evident. If you've got a card with strong personal or sentimental value that you plan to hold forever regardless of price, grading purely for protection and permanence is a reasonable call even if the math on resale value isn't the deciding factor.
What Happens If You Disagree With a Grade
Every collector eventually gets a grade back that feels lower than it should be. Most grading companies offer a review or reconsideration process for exactly this situation, though it typically comes with its own fee and no guarantee the grade actually changes — sometimes a second look confirms the original grade, sometimes it bumps up a half point, occasionally it even drops. Before paying for reconsideration, it's worth genuinely re-examining the card yourself under strong light with a loupe, comparing what you see against the specific subgrades or notes on the label, since graders do occasionally catch things that are easy to miss with the naked eye.
It's also worth remembering that grading is not perfectly consistent card to card, submission to submission, or company to company. Two visually identical copies of the same card can occasionally come back with different grades, simply because grading involves human judgment applied to genuinely tiny differences in a physical object. That's frustrating, but it's part of the process, and it's part of why a locked-in high grade carries a premium — it's not just documentation, it's a small dose of luck too.
Regrading and Crossovers
If you already own a card graded by one company and want to see if it grades higher with another, most services offer a "crossover" submission, where they'll evaluate the card while it's still in its original slab and either upgrade it into their own holder at the new grade, or send it back untouched if it doesn't meet their standard for that grade. This is a common move when a card has a PSA grade but a collector suspects it would score better under BGS's system, or vice versa, though crossover fees and rules vary by company and are worth checking directly before submitting.
Straight regrading — cracking a card out of its slab and resubmitting to the same company hoping for a better result — is also common, particularly right after a promising card just misses a higher grade by a hair. It's a bit of a gamble, since removing a card from a slab does carry a small real risk of damage during the process, so it's generally reserved for cards where the potential upside clearly outweighs that risk.
Slabs, Storage, and Long-Term Care
Once a card comes back graded, storage habits change a little. Slabs are far more durable than a raw card in a top-loader, but they're not indestructible — dropping a slab on a hard floor can crack the case, and while the card itself is often fine, a cracked slab does hurt resale appeal even if the grade technically hasn't changed. Slab-specific storage boxes and display cases are worth the modest investment if you're holding onto graded cards long term, both for physical protection and because a clean, well-organized graded collection is simply easier to show off, insure, and eventually sell.
Is Grading Getting More or Less Popular?
Grading volume across the industry has grown substantially over the past several years, driven partly by the broader boom in sports card collecting and partly by increased trust in third-party authentication as more transactions move online. That growth cuts both ways for collectors — on one hand, it means graded cards are more liquid and more widely accepted as the standard for high-value sales; on the other, it means turnaround times at the major grading companies have, at various points, stretched out considerably during peak demand, which is worth factoring in if you're planning to grade with a specific sale window in mind.
My Own Approach Going Forward
I'm holding off on grading most of what's currently in my collection until I've got a genuine batch worth submitting together, and I'm being selective about which cards make that cut — generally sticking to numbered parallels and rookies of players I'm confident are long-term holds, rather than grading speculatively. If you've got a card you're on the fence about sending in and want a second opinion, reach out through the Contact page — happy to talk through whether it seems like a good candidate.
← Back to Collector's Diary